Deloatch v. Harford County Board of Education

408 F. App'x 686
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 25, 2011
DocketNo. 10-1748
StatusPublished

This text of 408 F. App'x 686 (Deloatch v. Harford County Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deloatch v. Harford County Board of Education, 408 F. App'x 686 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janice McLean DeLoatch appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss her complaint alleging race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. DeLoatch v. Harford Cnty. Bd. of Educ., No. 1:09-cv-03125-CCB, 2010 WL 1956804 (D.Md. May 14, 2010). We further deny DeLoatch’s motion for transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
408 F. App'x 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deloatch-v-harford-county-board-of-education-ca4-2011.