DeLoach v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DeLoach v. State

831 So. 2d 691, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15124, 2002 WL 31306847

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 16, 2002

DocketNo. 3D01-2904

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 831 So. 2d 691 (DeLoach v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeLoach v. State, 831 So. 2d 691, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15124, 2002 WL 31306847 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Novaton v. State, 634 So.2d 607 (Fla.1994); Hubbard v. State, 662 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding that a negotiated sentence precludes appeal or collateral challenge of conviction and sentence on double jeopardy grounds apart from an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel); see also Hurlburt v. State, 807 So.2d 687 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that habitual offender sentences are not affected by the unconstitutionality of the 1995 sentencing guidelines); Hepburn v. State, 778 So.2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Novaton v. State, 634 So.2d 607 (Fla.1994); Hubbard v. State, 662 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding that a negotiated sentence precludes appeal or collateral challenge of conviction and sentence on double jeopardy grounds apart from an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel); see also Hurlburt v. State, 807 So.2d 687 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that habitual offender sentences are not affected by the unconstitutionality of the 1995 sentencing guidelines); Hepburn v. State, 778 So.2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

831 So. 2d 691, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15124, 2002 WL 31306847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deloach-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack