Deloach v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Deloach v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

423 So. 2d 480, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21774

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 10, 1982

DocketNo. AL-367

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 423 So. 2d 480 (Deloach v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deloach v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 423 So. 2d 480, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21774 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Deloach, a prisoner at Lawtey Correctional Institution, appeals from a commission decision that established his presumptive parole release date. We affirm.

A review of the record reveals Deloach’s initial point to be meritless as the Commission Action Form clearly reflects that the commission aggravated nineteen months for each of the two concurrent convictions.

As to Deloach’s final point, the commission properly aggravated his score using concurrent sentences pursuant to Rule 23-19.01(5), Florida Administrative Code. In Glisson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 420 So.2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) [7 FLW 2082], this Court held that “the use of concurrent sentences as aggravating factors ... does not encroach on the function of the judiciary and does not violate the separation of powers clause, Article II, Section 3, Florida Constitution.”

AFFIRMED.

SHAW and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI