DeLoach v. DeLoach

Court of Appeals of Georgia

DeLoach v. DeLoach

290 S.E.2d 292, 162 Ga. App. 185, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2097

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 6, 1982

Docket63253

StatusPublished

This text of 290 S.E.2d 292 (DeLoach v. DeLoach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeLoach v. DeLoach, 290 S.E.2d 292, 162 Ga. App. 185, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2097 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Carley, Judge.

Appellant-father and appellee-mother were divorced in February of 1977, at which time custody of their sole minor child was awarded to appellee. Subsequently, appellant instituted the instant action seeking custody of the child based upon his contentions that a [186]*186material change in conditions and circumstances relating to appellee rendered a change of custody in the best interests of the minor child. The trial court denied appellant’s petition and this court granted a discretionary appeal pursuant to Code Ann. § 6-701.1.

Decided April 6, 1982 Rehearing denied April 22, 1982 Arlene Keely DeLoach, Michael C. Eubanks, for appellant. Robert S. Lanier, for appellee.

After a thorough review of the entire record, we find reasonable evidence to support the judgment of the trial court. Robinson v. Ashmore, 232 Ga. 498, 500 (207 SE2d 484) (1974); Foster v. Foster, 241 Ga. 470 (246 SE2d 196) (1978). “Since the evidence did authorize the court’s judgment, we refuse to hold that the trial court abused its discretion in denying [appellant’s] petition. [Cits.]” Carter v. Foster, 158 Ga. App. 701 (282 SE2d 180) (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carley, Judge.

Appellant-father and appellee-mother were divorced in February of 1977, at which time custody of their sole minor child was awarded to appellee. Subsequently, appellant instituted the instant action seeking custody of the child based upon his contentions that a [186]*186material change in conditions and circumstances relating to appellee rendered a change of custody in the best interests of the minor child. The trial court denied appellant’s petition and this court granted a discretionary appeal pursuant to Code Ann. § 6-701.1.

Decided April 6, 1982 Rehearing denied April 22, 1982 Arlene Keely DeLoach, Michael C. Eubanks, for appellant. Robert S. Lanier, for appellee.

After a thorough review of the entire record, we find reasonable evidence to support the judgment of the trial court. Robinson v. Ashmore, 232 Ga. 498, 500 (207 SE2d 484) (1974); Foster v. Foster, 241 Ga. 470 (246 SE2d 196) (1978). “Since the evidence did authorize the court’s judgment, we refuse to hold that the trial court abused its discretion in denying [appellant’s] petition. [Cits.]” Carter v. Foster, 158 Ga. App. 701 (282 SE2d 180) (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 S.E.2d 292, 162 Ga. App. 185, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deloach-v-deloach-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack