Delmonico v. Bonta

District Court, N.D. California·Decided May 19, 2021·No. 4:21-cv-02009·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL JOHN DELMONICO, Case No. 21-cv-02009-HSG 8 Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 Vv. 10 ROB BONTA, 11 Respondent. 12

13 Petitioner has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 14 || challenging a 2018 misdemeanor conviction from Palo Alto Superior Court.’ On March 31, 2021, the 3 15 || Court dismissed the petition with leave to amend because the ineffective assistance of counsel a 16 || claim was insufficiently pled. ECF No. 3. The Court informed Petitioner that the failure to timely 3 17 || file an amended petition would result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute under 18 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Id. The deadline to file an amended petition has passed, and Plaintiff has 19 || not filed an amended petition or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, this 20 || petition is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute 21 || and for failure to comply with the Court’s March 31, 2021 order. The Clerk shall close the file. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 || Dated: 5/19/2021 24 Alayredd 5 Sb □□□ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 25 United States District Judge 26 27 ' The Clerk of the Court is directed to substitute Rob Bonta, the California Attorney General, in 2g || place of the previously named respondent because Attorney General Bonta is Petitioner’s current custodian. See Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891, 894 (9th Cir.), as amended (May 8, 1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delmonico v. Bonta, (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Delmonico v. Bonta (Delmonico v. Bonta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez
81 F.3d 891 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)