Del'Marmol v. Gollaher
220 F.2d 515
This text of 220 F.2d 515 (Del'Marmol v. Gollaher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Del'Marmol v. Gollaher, 220 F.2d 515 (9th Cir. 1955).
Opinion
The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Southern Division, dismissed applicant’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. It appears from applicant’s allegations that he has previously made a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence ana that that motion was denied. The application is dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence
28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
220 F.2d 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delmarmol-v-gollaher-ca9-1955.