Delmar Mayfield, Individually, and on Behalf of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Chisholm-Moore Hoist Division and Columbus McKinnon Corporation

467 F.2d 483
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 6, 1972·No. 72-2503·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence of defendant’s negligence to submit the case to the jury.

A careful consideration of the record convinces us that there was “evidence of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded men in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions”. Boeing Company v. Shipman, 5 Cir. 1969, 411 F.2d 365. The district court therefore properly denied the defendant’s motions for a directed [484]*484verdict and submitted the case to the jury. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delmar Mayfield, Individually, and on Behalf of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Chisholm-Moore Hoist Division and Columbus McKinnon Corporation, 467 F.2d 483 (5th Cir. 1972).

467 F.2d 483 (Delmar Mayfield, Individually, and on Behalf of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Chisholm-Moore Hoist Division and Columbus McKinnon Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Raine O. Andry v. Farrell Lines, Inc.
478 F.2d 758 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)