Delma Marroquin, D/B/A Luckie's Bonding Service v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 7, 2002
Docket13-01-00787-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Delma Marroquin, D/B/A Luckie's Bonding Service v. State (Delma Marroquin, D/B/A Luckie's Bonding Service v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delma Marroquin, D/B/A Luckie's Bonding Service v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion



NUMBERS 13-01-787-CV, 13-01-788-CV and 13-01-789-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

__________________________________________________________________

DELMA MARROQUIN, D/B/A LUCKIE'S BONDING SERVICE , Appellant,

v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, DELMA MARROQUIN, D/B/A LUCKIE'S BONDING SERVICE , attempted to perfect appeals from judgments entered by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause numbers 01-60181-4, 01-60700-4, and 01-60701-4 . Judgments in these causes were signed on July 10, 2001 . Timely motions for new trial were filed on August 9, 2001. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notices of appeal were due on October 8, 2001 , but were not filed until November 14, 2001 .

Notices of these defects were given so that steps could be taken to correct the defects, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defects were not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeals would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect her appeals, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeals are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 7th day of February, 2002 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Delma Marroquin, D/B/A Luckie's Bonding Service v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delma-marroquin-dba-luckies-bonding-service-v-stat-texapp-2002.