Dellos v. Chang

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 2012·No. SCPW-12-0000051·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-12-0000051

28-FEB-2012

02:44 PM

NO. SCPW-12-0000051

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

RAQUEL A. DELLOSA, TARCILA J. DELA CRUZ, ANNALYN S. LAZARO, and IDA P. OANDASAN, Petitioners,

vs.

THE HONORABLE GARY W.B. CHANG, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I and OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CIVIL NO. 09-1-1907-08)

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioners Raquel A. Dellosa,

Tarcila J. Dela Cruz, Annalyn S. Lazaro, and Ida P. Oandasan's

petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it

appears that: (1) the respondent judge's December 22, 2011 order

compelling petitioners to submit to medical and psychological

examinations is reviewable on appeal from a final judgment

entered in Civil No. 09-1-1907-08 and (2) disallowing observation

or recording of the examinations and disallowing discovery of the

examiners' general income data are not extraordinary situations

warranting mandamus relief. Therefore, petitioners are not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action. Such writs are not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts, nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate procedures.); Brende v. Hara, 113 Hawai'i 424, 429, 153 P.3d 1109, 1114 (2007) (Mandamus relief from discovery orders is "available for extraordinary situations."). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 28, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dellos v. Chang, (haw 2012).

Dellos v. Chang (Dellos v. Chang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kema v. Gaddis
982 P.2d 334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)
Brende v. Hara
153 P.3d 1109 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2007)