Dellmar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dellmar v. State

586 So. 2d 513, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13979, 1991 WL 200189

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 8, 1991

DocketNo. 91-294

StatusPublished

This text of 586 So. 2d 513 (Dellmar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dellmar v. State, 586 So. 2d 513, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13979, 1991 WL 200189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. We reverse and remand for a new trial upon the authority of White v. State, 579 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (failure to exclude prospective juror for cause was reversible error, where proper procedures were followed, peremptory challenges were exhausted, and challenge of another objectionable juror was denied). See also Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691 (Fla.1990).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. We reverse and remand for a new trial upon the authority of White v. State, 579 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (failure to exclude prospective juror for cause was reversible error, where proper procedures were followed, peremptory challenges were exhausted, and challenge of another objectionable juror was denied). See also Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691 (Fla.1990).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

586 So. 2d 513, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13979, 1991 WL 200189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dellmar-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack