Dellisanti v. State

602 So. 2d 998, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212, 1992 WL 197775
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 18, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1351
StatusPublished

This text of 602 So. 2d 998 (Dellisanti v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dellisanti v. State, 602 So. 2d 998, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212, 1992 WL 197775 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

KAHN, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to correct sentence. The relief sought was not appropriate for a 3.800 motion. Polmanteer v. State, 557 So.2d 678 (Fla. 2d DCA1990); Lomont v. State, 506 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 2d DCA1987).

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lomont v. State
506 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Polmanteer v. State
557 So. 2d 678 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
602 So. 2d 998, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212, 1992 WL 197775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dellisanti-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.