Dellari v. Biddle

Eighth Circuit

Dellari v. Biddle

5 F.2d 21, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2589

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 8, 1925

DocketNo. 6764

StatusPublished

This text of 5 F.2d 21 (Dellari v. Biddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dellari v. Biddle, 5 F.2d 21, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2589 (8th Cir. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The appeal in this ease is from an order of dismissal of the petition of appellant for a writ of [22]*22habeas corpus on the ground that the petition did not state facts sufficient to warrant the court below in granting it.

The questions in this case were the same as those treated in No. 6765, Harry Franklin v. W. I. Biddle, as Warden, etc., 5 F.(2d) 19. They were submitted for decision on the same briefs, and the order of dismissal in this case is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion in that ease, which is filed herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The appeal in this ease is from an order of dismissal of the petition of appellant for a writ of [22]*22habeas corpus on the ground that the petition did not state facts sufficient to warrant the court below in granting it.

The questions in this case were the same as those treated in No. 6765, Harry Franklin v. W. I. Biddle, as Warden, etc., 5 F.(2d) 19. They were submitted for decision on the same briefs, and the order of dismissal in this case is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion in that ease, which is filed herewith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 F.2d 21, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dellari-v-biddle-ca8-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack