Dell'Aquila v. Rohan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dell'Aquila v. Rohan

1 A.D.2d 785, 147 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6598

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 785 (Dell'Aquila v. Rohan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dell'Aquila v. Rohan, 1 A.D.2d 785, 147 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

This proceeding to review a determination made by respondents revoking petitioner’s restaurant liquor license and directing that no new license for the premises in question be issued for a period of twelve months has been transferred to this court. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1296.) Determination unanimously confirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination that petitioner had violated subdivision 6 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law in that he had permitted the licensed premises to become disorderly, and so to become in that he had permitted males to solicit male patrons therein for immoral purposes. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This proceeding to review a determination made by respondents revoking petitioner’s restaurant liquor license and directing that no new license for the premises in question be issued for a period of twelve months has been transferred to this court. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1296.) Determination unanimously confirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination that petitioner had violated subdivision 6 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law in that he had permitted the licensed premises to become disorderly, and so to become in that he had permitted males to solicit male patrons therein for immoral purposes. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 785, 147 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dellaquila-v-rohan-nyappdiv-1956.