Dellano v. State
This text of Dellano v. State (Dellano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 29, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D19-939 Lower Tribunal No. 08-42680A ________________
Rolando Dellano, Petitioner,
vs.
The State of Florida, Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Mandamus.
Rolando Dellano, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for respondent.
Before LOGUE, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ.
HENDON, J.
The petitioner, Rolando Dellano, filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus,
seeking issuance of a writ compelling the circuit court judge to rule on his “Motion to Withdraw Plea After Resentencing,” which the petitioner dated on June 27,
2018. Following our review of the lower tribunal docket and the information
provided by the petitioner, we deny the Petition for Writ of Mandamus as it
appears that the petitioner has not actually filed the Motion to Withdraw Plea After
Sentencing as a separate docket entry.1
Denied.
1 The lower tribunal docket indicates that the petitioner has filed several motions seeking to withdraw/vacate his plea, but none are titled “Motion to Withdraw Plea After Resentencing” or were filed on or after June 27, 2018. Further, the copy of the Motion to Withdraw Plea After Sentencing that the petitioner has attached to his Petition for Writ of Mandamus was actually included as an exhibit in other filings, not as a separate docket entry.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dellano v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dellano-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.