Dell v. Suggs

Supreme Court of Georgia

Dell v. Suggs

87 S.E.2d 72, 211 Ga. 525, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 374

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 1, 1955

Docket18891

StatusPublished

This text of 87 S.E.2d 72 (Dell v. Suggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dell v. Suggs, 87 S.E.2d 72, 211 Ga. 525, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 374 (Ga. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Since the amended petition, seeking to recover an alleged partner’s share of profits realized by a partnership of which he was a member in the operation of a real-estate brokerage business, alleges that the partnership was duly licensed, which means a license in complete conformity with Code § 84-1415, thus completely rebutting any contention that the petitioner unlawfully operated and hence can [526]*526not recover, a cause of action is alleged, and the court did not err in overruling the general demurrer.

Argued February 16, 1955 Decided April 1, 1955. Johnson, Hatcher & Meyerson, Henry M. Hatcher, Jr., for plaintiffs in error. Noah J. Stone, Joseph J. Fine, F. H. Boney, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Since the amended petition, seeking to recover an alleged partner’s share of profits realized by a partnership of which he was a member in the operation of a real-estate brokerage business, alleges that the partnership was duly licensed, which means a license in complete conformity with Code § 84-1415, thus completely rebutting any contention that the petitioner unlawfully operated and hence can [526]*526not recover, a cause of action is alleged, and the court did not err in overruling the general demurrer.

Argued February 16, 1955 Decided April 1, 1955. Johnson, Hatcher & Meyerson, Henry M. Hatcher, Jr., for plaintiffs in error. Noah J. Stone, Joseph J. Fine, F. H. Boney, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 S.E.2d 72, 211 Ga. 525, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dell-v-suggs-ga-1955.