Dell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dell v. State

673 So. 2d 576, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5449, 1996 WL 271583

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 22, 1996

DocketNo. 96-1141

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 576 (Dell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dell v. State, 673 So. 2d 576, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5449, 1996 WL 271583 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Zeigler v. State, 632 So.2d 48 (Fla.1993) (“A successive motion [for postcon-viction relief] may be dismissed if it fails to allege new or different grounds for relief and the prior determination was on the merits, or if new and different grounds are alleged, the failure to raise those issues in a prior motion constitutes an abuse of process.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 104, 130 L.Ed.2d 52 (1994); Ragan v. State, 643 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (sentence imposing adult sanctions on juvenile in the absence of specific findings regarding the criteria set forth in section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes, must be raised on direct appeal) (cited with approval by McCloud v. State, 653 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)), rev. denied, 613 So.2d 5 (Fla.1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Zeigler v. State, 632 So.2d 48 (Fla.1993) (“A successive motion [for postcon-viction relief] may be dismissed if it fails to allege new or different grounds for relief and the prior determination was on the merits, or if new and different grounds are alleged, the failure to raise those issues in a prior motion constitutes an abuse of process.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 104, 130 L.Ed.2d 52 (1994); Ragan v. State, 643 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (sentence imposing adult sanctions on juvenile in the absence of specific findings regarding the criteria set forth in section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes, must be raised on direct appeal) (cited with approval by McCloud v. State, 653 So.2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)), rev. denied, 613 So.2d 5 (Fla.1992).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

673 So. 2d 576, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5449, 1996 WL 271583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dell-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack