Dell Aquila v. Rubio

2019 NY Slip Op 2678
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 10, 2019
DocketIndex No. 33561/12
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2678 (Dell Aquila v. Rubio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dell Aquila v. Rubio, 2019 NY Slip Op 2678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Dell Aquila v Rubio (2019 NY Slip Op 02678)
Dell Aquila v Rubio
2019 NY Slip Op 02678
Decided on April 10, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 10, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
ROBERT J. MILLER
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

2017-00715
(Index No. 33561/12)

[*1]Carmine Dell Aquila, appellant,

v

Thomas Rubio, administrator of the estate of Rubio, et al., respondents, et al., defendant.


Westerman Ball Ederer Miller Zucker & Sharfstein, LLP, Uniondale, NY (Philip J. Campisi, Jr., and Greg S. Zucker of counsel), for appellant.

Steven G. Legum, Mineola, NY (Gina Biasi of counsel), for respondents.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover on promissory notes, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Elizabeth H. Emerson, J.), dated November 21, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for leave to renew those branches of his prior motion which were to vacate a temporary restraining order dated October 26, 2012, and, thereupon, to direct the release of the shares of Joseph O. Rubio in Smithtown Nissan, Inc., to the plaintiff, which had been denied in an order of the same court dated May 2, 2016, and, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to so much of its determination in the order dated May 2, 2016, as denied those branches of the plaintiff's prior motion.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination of the companion appeal (see Dell Aquila v Rubio, ___ AD3d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2016-05201; decided herewith]).

AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.

2017-00715 DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Carmine Dell Aquila, appellant, v Thomas Rubio,

administrator of the estate of Rubio, et al.,

respondents, et al., defendant.

(Index No. 33561/12)

Motion by the respondents to dismiss stated portions of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 21, 2016, on the ground that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 2678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dell-aquila-v-rubio-nyappdiv-2019.