D'Elissa v. D'Amato
98 A. 1085, 86 N.J. Eq. 244, 1 Stock. 244, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 446
Opinion
The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Gaebison, Swayze, Teenchabd, Paekee, Beegen, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, White, Teehune, Heppenheimeb, Williams, Tayloe, Gaednee — 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D'Elissa v. D'Amato, 98 A. 1085, 86 N.J. Eq. 244, 1 Stock. 244, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 446 (N.J. 1916).
98 A. 1085 (D'Elissa v. D'Amato) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.