D'Elissa v. D'Amato

98 A. 1085, 86 N.J. Eq. 244, 1 Stock. 244, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 446
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 19, 1916·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Gaebison, Swayze, Teenchabd, Paekee, Beegen, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, White, Teehune, Heppenheimeb, Williams, Tayloe, Gaednee — 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Elissa v. D'Amato, 98 A. 1085, 86 N.J. Eq. 244, 1 Stock. 244, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 446 (N.J. 1916).

98 A. 1085 (D'Elissa v. D'Amato) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.