Delisa v. Arthur F. Schmidt, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Delisa v. Arthur F. Schmidt, Inc.

262 A.D. 960, 29 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6633

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 16, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion of the defendant, appellant, Warren Norge Company, Inc., to amend its answer reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, upon condition that the said defendant, appellant, be ready for trial on September 22, 1941, or on such subsequent date as the case is reached for trial. The denial was an improper exercise of the court’s discretion. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 105; Muller v. City of Philadelphia, 113 App. Div. 92.) Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion of the defendant, appellant, Warren Norge Company, Inc., to amend its answer reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs, upon condition that the said defendant, appellant, be ready for trial on September 22, 1941, or on such subsequent date as the case is reached for trial. The denial was an improper exercise of the court’s discretion. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 105; Muller v. City of Philadelphia, 113 App. Div. 92.) Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Delisa v. Arthur F. Schmidt, Inc., 262 A.D. 960, 29 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 960 (Delisa v. Arthur F. Schmidt, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related