Delinger v. American News Co.

6 A.D.2d 1027, 178 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4636

This text of 6 A.D.2d 1027 (Delinger v. American News Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delinger v. American News Co., 6 A.D.2d 1027, 178 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency unanimously modified on the law so as to dismiss the second cause of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Defendants wrote, published and distributed a magazine article illustrated by a photograph of plaintiff, a physical training instructor, as a candidate for the title of “Mr. Universe — 1956”. The text of the article contained a discussion in general terms of the relationship between muscular development and virility. Such publication cannot be deemed an actionable use for trade or advertising under sections 50 and 51 of the Civil Rights Law (Dallesandro v. Holt & Co., 4 A D 2d 470; Siegel v. Esquire, Inc., 4 A D 2d 477; Oma v. Hillman Periodicals, 281 App. Div. 240). Settle order. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oma v. Hillman Periodicals, Inc.
281 A.D. 240 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A.D.2d 1027, 178 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delinger-v-american-news-co-nyappdiv-1958.