Delijani v. Delijani

107 A.D.3d 930, 970 N.Y.S.2d 700

This text of 107 A.D.3d 930 (Delijani v. Delijani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delijani v. Delijani, 107 A.D.3d 930, 970 N.Y.S.2d 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered December 4, 2003, the nonparty Sean Sabeti, the defendant’s former attorney, appeals from an order of the [931]*931Supreme Court, Nassau County (Marón, J.), dated May 13, 2011, which, after a hearing, in effect, granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to hold him in criminal contempt for violating a “so-ordered” stipulation dated June 9, 2009, and imposed a fine in the sum of $1,000 for his criminal contempt.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To prevail on a motion to punish for criminal contempt, the moving party must establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the alleged contemnor willfully disobeyed a clear and unequivocal court order (see Matter of Department of Envtl. Protection of City of N.Y. v Department of Envtl. Conservation of State of N.Y., 70 NY2d 233, 240 [1987]; Town Bd. of Town of Southampton v R.K.B. Realty, LLC, 91 AD3d 628, 629 [2012]; McGrath v McGrath, 85 AD3d 742, 742-743 [2011]; Judiciary Law § 750 [A] [3]). Here, contrary to the appellant’s contention, there was sufficient evidence presented at the hearing to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that his repeated violation of a “so-ordered” stipulation dated June 9, 2009, was willful (see Matter of Department of Envtl. Protection of City of N.Y. v Department of Envtl. Conservation of State of N.Y., 70 NY2d at 241; Town Bd. of Town of Southampton v R.K.B. Realty, LLC, 91 AD3d at 630; Casavecchia v Mizrahi, 57 AD3d 702, 704 [2008]; Papa v 24 Caryl Ave. Realty Co., 14 AD3d 600 [2005]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court. Hall, J.P., Lott, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Papa v. 24 Caryl Avenue Realty Co.
14 A.D.3d 600 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Casavecchia v. Mizrahi
57 A.D.3d 702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
McGrath v. McGrath
85 A.D.3d 742 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Town Board of Town of Southampton v. R.K.B. Realty, LLC
91 A.D.3d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 A.D.3d 930, 970 N.Y.S.2d 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delijani-v-delijani-nyappdiv-2013.