Deligtisch v. Borson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Deligtisch v. Borson

229 A.D. 201, 241 N.Y.S. 847, 1930 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10339

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 229 A.D. 201 (Deligtisch v. Borson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deligtisch v. Borson, 229 A.D. 201, 241 N.Y.S. 847, 1930 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The affidavits and order appealed from show that there was no actual strike but that the defendant attempted to initiate the controversy by acts of violence, intimidation and interference with the free entrance of patrons and employees into plaintiff’s premises.

Under such circumstances, the provisions of the order appealed from cannot be sustained.

The order should be reversed in so far as appealed from, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Dowling, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ.

Order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs ane disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI