Deliford v. State

527 So. 2d 949, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1572, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2854, 1988 WL 67778
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Deliford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 894
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 5, 1988·No. No. 87-2169·Published

Opinion

WARREN H. COBB, Associate Judge.

In the case of Deliford v. State, 505 So.2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), this court reversed the departure sentence imposed upon the defendant Deliford because the reason given therefor was insufficient. We remanded the cause to the trial court “with directions to resentence the defendant within the sentencing guidelines.” Id. at 524. The trial court declined to follow that direction, and attempted to again depart on the basis of written reasons not included in the first sentence, contrary to the holding in Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987).

[950]*950We reverse and again remand to the trial court with directions to resentence the defendant within the sentencing guidelines— which means the sentence cannot exceed the guidelines maximum of 17 years.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deliford v. State, 527 So. 2d 949, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1572, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2854, 1988 WL 67778 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

527 So. 2d 949 (Deliford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deliford v. State
505 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Shull v. Dugger
515 So. 2d 748 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)