Deliford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Deliford v. State

527 So. 2d 949, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1572, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2854, 1988 WL 67778

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 5, 1988

DocketNo. 87-2169

StatusPublished

This text of 527 So. 2d 949 (Deliford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deliford v. State, 527 So. 2d 949, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1572, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2854, 1988 WL 67778 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

WARREN H. COBB, Associate Judge.

In the case of Deliford v. State, 505 So.2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), this court reversed the departure sentence imposed upon the defendant Deliford because the reason given therefor was insufficient. We remanded the cause to the trial court “with directions to resentence the defendant within the sentencing guidelines.” Id. at 524. The trial court declined to follow that direction, and attempted to again depart on the basis of written reasons not included in the first sentence, contrary to the holding in Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987).

[950]*950We reverse and again remand to the trial court with directions to resentence the defendant within the sentencing guidelines— which means the sentence cannot exceed the guidelines maximum of 17 years.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WARREN H. COBB, Associate Judge.

In the case of Deliford v. State, 505 So.2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), this court reversed the departure sentence imposed upon the defendant Deliford because the reason given therefor was insufficient. We remanded the cause to the trial court “with directions to resentence the defendant within the sentencing guidelines.” Id. at 524. The trial court declined to follow that direction, and attempted to again depart on the basis of written reasons not included in the first sentence, contrary to the holding in Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987).

[950]*950We reverse and again remand to the trial court with directions to resentence the defendant within the sentencing guidelines— which means the sentence cannot exceed the guidelines maximum of 17 years.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 So. 2d 949, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1572, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2854, 1988 WL 67778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deliford-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack