Delia v. Winter Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Delia v. Winter Bros.

183 A.D.2d 1006, 583 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6620

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 183 A.D.2d 1006 (Delia v. Winter Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delia v. Winter Bros., 183 A.D.2d 1006, 583 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Mercure, J.

Appeal (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from an order of the Supreme Court (Meehan, J.), entered April 18, 1991 in Rockland County, which, inter alia, granted defendant Donald A. Leenig’s motion for a change of venue.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for the conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death of Arthur L. Talking-ton, Jr. as the result of an automobile accident which took place in Rockland County. Venue was placed in Bronx County because of the purported residence of defendant Anthony Coscia at 2541 Boston Post Road in Bronx County. Alleging that Bronx County was not a proper county (see, CPLR 510 [1]), defendant Donald A. Leenig first demanded and then [1007]*1007moved for a change of venue to Rockland County pursuant to CPLR 511. Supreme Court granted the motion and plaintiff appeals.

We affirm. In an affidavit submitted in support of Leenig’s motion and Coscia’s cross motion to change venue, Coscia stated that he currently resided in Rockland County, that he had resided in that county for the past eight years and that the Bronx County address set forth on the summons was that of one of his businesses, Anthony Coscia Contracting Corporation, which was not a party to the action. These averments satisfied Leenig’s burden of establishing that Coscia did not reside in Bronx County and, in the absence of contrary evidence, the movants were entitled to a change of venue as of right.

We have examined plaintiffs remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to defendants Anthony Coscia and Donald A. Leenig.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mercure, J.

Appeal (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from an order of the Supreme Court (Meehan, J.), entered April 18, 1991 in Rockland County, which, inter alia, granted defendant Donald A. Leenig’s motion for a change of venue.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover for the conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death of Arthur L. Talking-ton, Jr. as the result of an automobile accident which took place in Rockland County. Venue was placed in Bronx County because of the purported residence of defendant Anthony Coscia at 2541 Boston Post Road in Bronx County. Alleging that Bronx County was not a proper county (see, CPLR 510 [1]), defendant Donald A. Leenig first demanded and then [1007]*1007moved for a change of venue to Rockland County pursuant to CPLR 511. Supreme Court granted the motion and plaintiff appeals.

We affirm. In an affidavit submitted in support of Leenig’s motion and Coscia’s cross motion to change venue, Coscia stated that he currently resided in Rockland County, that he had resided in that county for the past eight years and that the Bronx County address set forth on the summons was that of one of his businesses, Anthony Coscia Contracting Corporation, which was not a party to the action. These averments satisfied Leenig’s burden of establishing that Coscia did not reside in Bronx County and, in the absence of contrary evidence, the movants were entitled to a change of venue as of right.

We have examined plaintiffs remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to defendants Anthony Coscia and Donald A. Leenig.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 A.D.2d 1006, 583 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delia-v-winter-bros-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack