Delgardo v. Bratton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Delgardo v. Bratton

234 A.D.2d 125, 651 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12532

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D.2d 125 (Delgardo v. Bratton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delgardo v. Bratton, 234 A.D.2d 125, 651 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated December 16, 1994, imposing a forfeiture of 10 vacation days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Leland DeGrasse, JJ, entered July 10, 1995) unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence, including the testimony of the complainant and the disinterested witness, supports the finding that petitioner wrongfully pushed the complainant and neglected to take prompt and timely police action regarding a reported street dispute. Such testimony was found to be credible by the Hearing Officer, and we see no reason to disturb such resolution of issues of credibility (see, Matter of Paolone v Ward, 168 AD2d 234). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Milonas, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated December 16, 1994, imposing a forfeiture of 10 vacation days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Leland DeGrasse, JJ, entered July 10, 1995) unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence, including the testimony of the complainant and the disinterested witness, supports the finding that petitioner wrongfully pushed the complainant and neglected to take prompt and timely police action regarding a reported street dispute. Such testimony was found to be credible by the Hearing Officer, and we see no reason to disturb such resolution of issues of credibility (see, Matter of Paolone v Ward, 168 AD2d 234). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Milonas, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D.2d 125, 651 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delgardo-v-bratton-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack