Delgado v. SHHS

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided December 28, 1994·No. 94-1609·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion



December 28, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 94-1609

JAIME DELGADO,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Carmen C. Cerezo, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Cyr, Circuit Judge, _____________
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and ____________________
Stahl, Circuit Judge. _____________

____________________

Fabio A. Roman Garcia on brief for appellant. _____________________
Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Maria Hortensia Rios, _____________ ______________________
Assistant United States Attorney, and Robert M. Peckrill, Assistant ___________________
Regional Counsel, Department of Health & Human Services, on brief for
appellee.

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. Plaintiff-appellant Jamie Delgado appeals __________

from a district court judgment affirming the decision of the

Secretary of Health and Human Services denying his

application for disability insurance benefits. For the

reasons that follow, we vacate the judgment below and remand

the case.

I.

Delgado was born on June 13, 1944. He completed

approximately three years of school, but cannot read or

write. For approximately twenty-five years, Delgado worked

at La Estrella bakery, gradually progressing to the jobs of

baker and confectioner. In 1986, he stopped working when the

owner of the bakery died and the bakery shut down.

Thereafter, he worked for a few weeks at another bakery, but

was dismissed because his "[right] foot got swollen, and [he]

missed work . . . " He has not worked since then, and he

alleges a disability onset date of December 30, 1986.

Delgado was insured through December 31, 1991.

On September 21, 1989, Delgado filed an application for

benefits alleging that he is disabled due to a right leg

injury. In a subsequently filed disability report, Delgado

alleged that after breaking his ankle on February 2, 1984, he

could no longer work full days at the bakery. He complained

that eventually he had to stop working entirely because his

leg swells when he stands up for long periods of time. He

-3-

also complained that since the accident, he has experienced

pain and numbness in his right hand.

The Social Security Administration denied Delgado's

application initially and on reconsideration. On October 5,

1990, Delgado obtained a hearing before an Administrative Law

Judge (ALJ). Delgado and a medical expert testified. On

October 24, 1990, the ALJ determined that Delgado is not

disabled. The Appeals Council, however, accepted review and

remanded the case to the ALJ for further proceedings. A

second hearing, held on October 22, 1991, included the

testimony of a vocational expert. Delgado was represented

by counsel at both hearings.

The medical record before the ALJ is well-summarized in

his reports. Briefly, Delgado suffered a crush injury to his

right hand, in 1969, which resulted in some loss of motion.

On February 9, 1984, Delgado slipped at work, suffered an

undisplaced spiral fracture in his right ankle, and was

treated at El Buen Hospital under the auspices of the State

Insurance Fund. Records from the Fund disclose that on

January 19, 1990, Delgado was examined by a peripherovascular

surgeon in connection with complaints of pain and swelling in

his right ankle. The examination revealed a well-oriented,

middle-aged man, in no acute distress, and without

significant edema.

-4-

On November 13, 1989, Delgado was seen by Dr. Paul

Kindy, a consultative orthopedic physician. He noted that

Delgado complained of pain and swelling in the right ankle,

pain in both knees, and weakness and pain in the right hand.

The examination revealed some loss of motion in the right

wrist and thumb, as well as in the right ankle. Both knees

had a full range of motion and good strength. Delgado's

ability to squat, however, was limited to fifty percent of

normal due to ankle and knee pain. The consulting physician

diagnosed a crush injury deformity of the right hand with

partial wrist and thumb motion loss; a healed fracture in the

right ankle with partial loss of motion and weakness; and

paint and crepitus (a crackling sound) in both knees.1

Delgado testified that if he stands up for a few hours,

he experiences pain and swelling in his right ankle and leg,

as well as in both knees. The swelling is alleviated if he

lies down. Although the pain in his leg is "terrible," he

obtains some relief when he lies down. He also takes Tylenol

or Panadol to relieve the pain. He can walk for up to one-

half hour and can sit for up to an hour and a half. During

the day, he walks to the park, talks to neighbors, and

____________________

1. The record also contains two assessments of Delgado's
residual functional capacity prepared by non-examining
medical consultants. These consultants concluded that
Delgado has manipulative and postural limitations, but can
lift or carry fifty pounds occasionally and twenty-five
pounds frequently, can stand or walk about six hours in a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delgado v. SHHS, (1st Cir. 1994).

Delgado v. SHHS (Delgado v. SHHS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related