Delgado v. City of Miami Beach

518 So. 2d 968, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 230, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 276, 1988 WL 4042
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 19, 1988
DocketNo. 87-868
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 518 So. 2d 968 (Delgado v. City of Miami Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delgado v. City of Miami Beach, 518 So. 2d 968, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 230, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 276, 1988 WL 4042 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

HENDRY, Judge.

Anna Delgado appeals from a summary judgment which found that, as a matter of law, the City of Miami Beach was protected from liability under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. We affirm.

On July 4th, 1984, Delgado attended a concert and fireworks display sponsored by the City of Miami Beach. During the concert, someone in the crowd ignited fireworks which struck and burned Delgado’s leg. The crux of Delgado’s argument is that the city, acting in an operational capacity as the sponsor of the above events, failed to prohibit the possession and detonation of fireworks by individuals.1

We disagree with Delgado’s contention that the city’s actions were an operational-level function. More correctly, the city’s actions fell within the planning-level, discretionary function of government, for which no liability attaches. The manner in which a city, through its police officers, exercises discretionary authority to enforce compliance with the laws and protect the public safety, falls squarely within the city’s power to govern. Accordingly, the city is protected under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Trianon Park Condominium Ass’n v. City of Hialeah, 468 So.2d 912 (Fla.1985); Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010 (Fla.1979). See also City of Daytona Beach v. Palmer, 469 So.2d 121 (Fla.1985) (decisions of firefighters in combatting a fire); Higdon v. Metro. Dade County, 446 So.2d 203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (provisions to warn individuals of riot); Ellmer v. City of St. Petersburg 378 So.2d 825 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) (provision of police protection during riot).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BROWARD COUNTY v. CHRISTINA MANARITE
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
Sanchez v. State
245 So. 3d 933 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Miami-Dade County v. Pozos
242 So. 3d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Ameijeiras v. METROPOLITAN DADE CTY.
534 So. 2d 812 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
518 So. 2d 968, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 230, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 276, 1988 WL 4042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delgado-v-city-of-miami-beach-fladistctapp-1988.