Delgado-Medina v. Holder
This text of Delgado-Medina v. Holder (Delgado-Medina v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 31 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JUAN JOSE DELGADO-MEDINA, No. 06-73419
Petitioner, Agency No. A092-260-247
v. ORDER* ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 25, 2011** Pasadena, California
Before: KLEINFELD, LUCERO,*** and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Respondent's Unopposed Motion to Remand the case to the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) is GRANTED.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Carlos F. Lucero, Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. The BIA shall reconsider its June 8, 2006 decision in light of Sinotes-Cruz v.
Gonzales, 468 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 2006). The BIA may direct the parties to file
additional briefs, and the parties may seek leave of the BIA to file such additional
briefs as they deem appropriate.
Petitioner’s removal is stayed pending a decision in this matter by the BIA.
Parties will bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.
A certified copy of this order sent to the BIA shall constitute the mandate of
this court.
REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Delgado-Medina v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delgado-medina-v-holder-ca9-2011.