DelGadillo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DelGadillo v. City of New York

14 A.D.3d 589, 787 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 544

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 2005·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered April 29, 2002, which denied their motion, inter alia, to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to show, inter alia, the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see generally Castillo v City of New York, 6 AD3d 568 [2004]; Basetti v Nour, 287 AD2d 126, 133-135 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Adams, Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered April 29, 2002, which denied their motion, inter alia, to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to show, inter alia, the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see generally Castillo v City of New York, 6 AD3d 568 [2004]; Basetti v Nour, 287 AD2d 126, 133-135 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Adams, Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

DelGadillo v. City of New York, 14 A.D.3d 589, 787 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

14 A.D.3d 589 (DelGadillo v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related