DelGadillo v. City of New York
This text of 14 A.D.3d 589 (DelGadillo v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered April 29, 2002, which denied their motion, inter alia, to restore the action to the trial calendar.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs failed to show, inter alia, the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see generally Castillo v City of New York, 6 AD3d 568 [2004]; Basetti v Nour, 287 AD2d 126, 133-135 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Adams, Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.D.3d 589, 787 N.Y.S.2d 885, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delgadillo-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2005.