Delfani v. U.S. Capitol Guide Board

D.C. Circuit

Delfani v. U.S. Capitol Guide Board

198 F. App'x 9

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedSeptember 22, 2006

DocketNo. 05-5157

StatusPublished

This text of 198 F. App'x 9 (Delfani v. U.S. Capitol Guide Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delfani v. U.S. Capitol Guide Board, 198 F. App'x 9 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs of the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for oral argument. See D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Order of the District Court in Delfani v. U.S. Capitol Guide Board, Civil Action No. 03-0949(RWR), 2005 WL 736644, at *1, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5661, at *1 (D.D.C. March 31, 2005) be affirmed. The district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff had an administrative complaint pending when she filed this civil action. We need not decide whether a claimant’s election of the administrative option is irrevocable such that any later-filed civil action in the district court must be dismissed.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs of the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for oral argument. See D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Order of the District Court in Delfani v. U.S. Capitol Guide Board, Civil Action No. 03-0949(RWR), 2005 WL 736644, at *1, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5661, at *1 (D.D.C. March 31, 2005) be affirmed. The district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff had an administrative complaint pending when she filed this civil action. We need not decide whether a claimant’s election of the administrative option is irrevocable such that any later-filed civil action in the district court must be dismissed.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 F. App'x 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delfani-v-us-capitol-guide-board-cadc-2006.