Deleveaux v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Deleveaux v. State

646 So. 2d 850, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12579, 1994 WL 715192

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 28, 1994

DocketNo. 94-911

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 646 So. 2d 850 (Deleveaux v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deleveaux v. State, 646 So. 2d 850, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12579, 1994 WL 715192 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cedrick Deleveaux appeals his conviction of manslaughter with a firearm and a restitution order. We find no trial error and affirm the conviction.

Defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the restitution order. In this case, the trial court ordered a presentence investigation (“PSI”). The PSI recommended that the defendant be ordered to pay $3,000 restitution to the victim’s next-of-kin for funeral expenses. The court imposed restitution as recommended. There was no objection by defendant. In the absence of a contemporaneous objection, the point is not preserved for appellate review. Flanagan v. State, 536 So.2d 275, 276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); see also Driggers v. State, 622 So.2d 1374, 1375 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Nettles v. State, 611 So.2d 103, 104 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Reynolds v. State, 598 So.2d 188, 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Cheatham v. State, 593 So.2d 270, 271-72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Cedrick Deleveaux appeals his conviction of manslaughter with a firearm and a restitution order. We find no trial error and affirm the conviction.

Defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the restitution order. In this case, the trial court ordered a presentence investigation (“PSI”). The PSI recommended that the defendant be ordered to pay $3,000 restitution to the victim’s next-of-kin for funeral expenses. The court imposed restitution as recommended. There was no objection by defendant. In the absence of a contemporaneous objection, the point is not preserved for appellate review. Flanagan v. State, 536 So.2d 275, 276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); see also Driggers v. State, 622 So.2d 1374, 1375 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Nettles v. State, 611 So.2d 103, 104 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Reynolds v. State, 598 So.2d 188, 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Cheatham v. State, 593 So.2d 270, 271-72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

646 So. 2d 850, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12579, 1994 WL 715192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deleveaux-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack