Delevan v. Delevan

69 A.D.3d 718, 891 N.Y.2d 651

This text of 69 A.D.3d 718 (Delevan v. Delevan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delevan v. Delevan, 69 A.D.3d 718, 891 N.Y.2d 651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

The appeal by the father must be dismissed on the ground that he is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511). The father obtained all of the relief he sought in his motion, which was, inter alia, to vacate an order of the same court dated August 30, 2007, terminating his visitation, and to reinstate the provisions of a prior order of visitation dated June 19, 2007, awarding him supervised visitation (see Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 545 [1983]; Parimist Funding Corp. v Suffolk Vascular Assoc., PLLC, 62 AD3d 974, 975 [2009]; Ell v S.E.T. Landscape Design, 286 AD2d 414 [2001]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of Education
458 N.E.2d 1241 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Parimist Funding Corp. v. Suffolk Vascular Associates, PLLC
62 A.D.3d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Ell v. S.E.T. Landscape Design, Inc.
286 A.D.2d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 A.D.3d 718, 891 N.Y.2d 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delevan-v-delevan-nyappdiv-2010.