Delevan v. Delevan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Delevan v. Delevan

69 A.D.3d 718, 891 N.Y.2d 651

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 2010·Published

Opinion

The appeal by the father must be dismissed on the ground that he is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511). The father obtained all of the relief he sought in his motion, which was, inter alia, to vacate an order of the same court dated August 30, 2007, terminating his visitation, and to reinstate the provisions of a prior order of visitation dated June 19, 2007, awarding him supervised visitation (see Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 545 [1983]; Parimist Funding Corp. v Suffolk Vascular Assoc., PLLC, 62 AD3d 974, 975 [2009]; Ell v S.E.T. Landscape Design, 286 AD2d 414 [2001]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeal by the father must be dismissed on the ground that he is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511). The father obtained all of the relief he sought in his motion, which was, inter alia, to vacate an order of the same court dated August 30, 2007, terminating his visitation, and to reinstate the provisions of a prior order of visitation dated June 19, 2007, awarding him supervised visitation (see Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 545 [1983]; Parimist Funding Corp. v Suffolk Vascular Assoc., PLLC, 62 AD3d 974, 975 [2009]; Ell v S.E.T. Landscape Design, 286 AD2d 414 [2001]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.

Delevan v. Delevan, 69 A.D.3d 718, 891 N.Y.2d 651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

69 A.D.3d 718 (Delevan v. Delevan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related