Deleston v. Warden

Fourth Circuit

Deleston v. Warden

421 F. App'x 272

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 5, 2011·No. No. 10-7450·Published

Opinion

[273]*273Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Deleston, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Deleston v. Warden, No. 6:10-cv-02086-DCN, 2010 WL 3829220 (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[273]*273Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Deleston, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Deleston v. Warden, No. 6:10-cv-02086-DCN, 2010 WL 3829220 (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Deleston v. Warden, 421 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

421 F. App'x 272 (Deleston v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related