Deleon v. Prack
This text of 111 A.D.3d 1204 (Deleon v. Prack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1205]*1205Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
A substance abuse program assistant overheard petitioner declare to other inmates that he was going to hit the assistant “over the head with a . . . chair” if he was kept in the program for a prolonged period of time. Petitioner was accordingly charged in a misbehavior report with violating various prison disciplinary rules, and was found guilty of creating a disturbance following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of the program assistant who authored it provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Phillips v Fischer, 79 AD3d 1492, 1492 [2010]; Matter of Johnson v Selsky, 271 AD2d 770, 770-771 [2000], lv dismissed and denied 95 NY2d 918 [2000]). Petitioner’s assertion that the misbehavior report was authored in retaliation for a grievance he had filed created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Toliver v Commissioner of N.Y. State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 107 AD3d 1283, 1284 [2013]).
Petitioner’s remaining contentions, to the extent that they are properly preserved for our review, have been examined and found to lack merit.
Peters, PJ., Rose, Lahtinen and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 A.D.3d 1204, 975 N.Y.S.2d 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deleon-v-prack-nyappdiv-2013.