Delene v. D. HAYWOOD & ASSOCIATES, PC
720 N.W.2d 317, 476 Mich. 869
This text of 720 N.W.2d 317 (Delene v. D. HAYWOOD & ASSOCIATES, PC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Delene v. D. HAYWOOD & ASSOCIATES, PC, 720 N.W.2d 317, 476 Mich. 869 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Richard DELENE and Nancy Delene, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
D. HAYWOOD & ASSOCIATES, P.C., now known as Haywood Harrison, P.C., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 18, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
720 N.W.2d 317, 476 Mich. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delene-v-d-haywood-associates-pc-mich-2006.