Delegal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Delegal v. State

126 So. 3d 1232, 2012 WL 5232203, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18497

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 24, 2012

DocketNo. 4D11-1388

StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 3d 1232 (Delegal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delegal v. State, 126 So. 3d 1232, 2012 WL 5232203, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18497 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Delegal appeals an order that denied his petition for writ of habeas corpus in which he sought: 1) jail credit for time spent in federal custody following Florida’s filing of a detainer, and 2) a hearing setting a new presumptive release date. We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief on both claims. See Gethers v. State, 838 So.2d 504 (Fla.2003); Solomon v. State, 69 So.3d 396 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Alphonso v. State, 20 So.3d 959, 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Our affirmance of Dele-gal’s second point is without prejudice to his ability to seek mandamus relief in the Leon County Circuit Court. Sullivan v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 920 So.2d 106, 107 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (citing Sheley v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 720 So.2d 216, 217 (Fla.1998)).

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Delegal appeals an order that denied his petition for writ of habeas corpus in which he sought: 1) jail credit for time spent in federal custody following Florida’s filing of a detainer, and 2) a hearing setting a new presumptive release date. We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief on both claims. See Gethers v. State, 838 So.2d 504 (Fla.2003); Solomon v. State, 69 So.3d 396 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Alphonso v. State, 20 So.3d 959, 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). Our affirmance of Dele-gal’s second point is without prejudice to his ability to seek mandamus relief in the Leon County Circuit Court. Sullivan v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 920 So.2d 106, 107 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (citing Sheley v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 720 So.2d 216, 217 (Fla.1998)).

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 So. 3d 1232, 2012 WL 5232203, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delegal-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack