Delbridge v. Dewalt

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 2006
Docket05-7039
StatusUnpublished

This text of Delbridge v. Dewalt (Delbridge v. Dewalt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delbridge v. Dewalt, (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7039

KENNETH DELBRIDGE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STEPHEN M. DEWALT, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (CA-05-1487-1-BEL)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Delbridge, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Delbridge, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Delbridge v. Dewalt, No. CA-05-1487-1-BEL

(D. Md. June 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Delbridge v. Dewalt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delbridge-v-dewalt-ca4-2006.