Delay v. State

1929 OK CR 310, 279 P. 925, 44 Okla. Crim. 105, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 31
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedAugust 3, 1929
DocketNo. A-6670.
StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 310 (Delay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delay v. State, 1929 OK CR 310, 279 P. 925, 44 Okla. Crim. 105, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 31 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Payne county on a charge of manufacturing whisky, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $300 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 60 days.

This case is substantially the same as the case of Frank Dunkin v. State, 44 Okla. 102, 279 Pac. 923, decided at this sitting of the court. The defendant Frank Dunkin, was charged with selling, while this defendant is charged with manufacturing, whisky. The defendant in this case presents the same assignments of error on appeal to this court as were presented in the Dunkin Case.

Therefore this case is reversed for the same reasons as stated and authorities cited in the opinion rendered in the case of Frank Dunkin v. State.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunkin v. State
1929 OK CR 308 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1929)
Phillips v. Dillingham
1914 OK 490 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1929 OK CR 310, 279 P. 925, 44 Okla. Crim. 105, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delay-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.