DeLay v. Galt
81 S.E. 195, 141 Ga. 406, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 222
Opinion
Where, to a suit on a note, the defendant admits the due execution of the note and pleads total failure of consideration, the burden is upon him to establish that plea. The evidence was not of such a character as to demand a verdict for the defendant, and the court erred in directing the same.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DeLay v. Galt, 81 S.E. 195, 141 Ga. 406, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 222 (Ga. 1914).
81 S.E. 195 (DeLay v. Galt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richards v. Southern Finance Corp.
319 S.E.2d 103 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
United Rentals Systems, Inc. v. Safeco Insurance
273 S.E.2d 868 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Henco Advertising, Inc. v. Geographics, Inc.
271 S.E.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Pepsico Truck Rental, Inc. v. Eastern Foods, Inc.
243 S.E.2d 662 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Carlton Co. v. Allen
218 S.E.2d 666 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Coast Scopitone, Inc. v. Self
192 S.E.2d 513 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Abernathy v. Putnam
69 S.E.2d 896 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Morgan's Inc. v. Mons
54 S.E.2d 498 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
DeLay v. Galt
89 S.E. 214 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)