DELAY v. Crawford

242 S.W.3d 744, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1646, 2007 WL 4234644

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Dallas Delay appeals from the circuit court’s declaratory judgment denying his constitutional challenge to section 217.690 and related regulations governing parole. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the facts and restating the law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).