DELAY v. Crawford
This text of 242 S.W.3d 744 (DELAY v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Appellant Dallas Delay appeals from the circuit court’s declaratory judgment denying his constitutional challenge to section 217.690 and related regulations governing parole. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the facts and restating the law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 S.W.3d 744, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1646, 2007 WL 4234644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delay-v-crawford-moctapp-2007.