Delaware River & Bay Authority v. Minor

Superior Court of Delaware

Delaware River & Bay Authority v. Minor

DecidedMarch 9, 2021

DocketN19A-10-004 JRJ

StatusPublished

This text of Delaware River & Bay Authority v. Minor (Delaware River & Bay Authority v. Minor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delaware River & Bay Authority v. Minor, (Del. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Superior Court of the State of Delaware

Jan R. Jurden Leonard L. Williams Justice Center President Judge 500 North King Street, Suite 10400 Wilmington, Delaware 19801-3733 Telephone (302) 255-0665

March 9, 2021

Adria B. Martinelli, Esquire Frank Minor Lauren E.M. Russell, Esquire 210 Abbey Lane Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP Logan Township, NJ 08085 Rodney Square 1000 N. King St. Daniel C. Mulveny, Esquire Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Department of Justice 820 North French Street, 6th Fl. Wilmington, Delaware 19801

RE: Delaware River & Bay Authority v. Frank Minor and Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board C.A. No. N19A-10-004 JRJ

Dear Counsel and Mr. Minor:

The Court has received two letters filed on March 3, 2021—one filed by Appellee Frank Minor and the other filed by counsel for Appellant Delaware River & Bay Authority.1

In his letter, Mr. Minor asks the Court to strike Appellant’s Reply Brief because it was filed later than 10 days after Appellant’s counsel received his Responding Brief.2 Mr. Minor notes that this deadline was established in the briefing schedule that the Court issued on November 19, 2020.3

1 Trans. ID. 66388073; Trans. ID. 66388192. 2 Trans. ID. 66388073. 3 Trans. ID. 66388192; Trans. ID. 66126992. Appellant’s counsel respond that, due to COVID-19, they had been working remotely when the Responding Brief was delivered.4 They also explain that their law firm’s “normal protocols for logging and emailing mail to the recipient were for some reason not followed in this instance,” so they did not receive notice of the Responding Brief until it was filed electronically.5 After they received notice, Appellant’s counsel filed the Reply Brief within 10 days pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 6(a).6

Recognizing that we are in the midst of a global pandemic, which has sown much logistical confusion, the Court declines to strike Appellant’s Reply Brief for untimeliness.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Jan R. Jurden

Jan R. Jurden President Judge

JRJ:mls

cc: Prothonotary

4 Trans. ID. 66388192. 5 Id. 6 Id. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Superior Court of the State of Delaware

Jan R. Jurden Leonard L. Williams Justice Center President Judge 500 North King Street, Suite 10400 Wilmington, Delaware 19801-3733 Telephone (302) 255-0665

March 9, 2021

Adria B. Martinelli, Esquire Frank Minor Lauren E.M. Russell, Esquire 210 Abbey Lane Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP Logan Township, NJ 08085 Rodney Square 1000 N. King St. Daniel C. Mulveny, Esquire Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Department of Justice 820 North French Street, 6th Fl. Wilmington, Delaware 19801

RE: Delaware River & Bay Authority v. Frank Minor and Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board C.A. No. N19A-10-004 JRJ

Dear Counsel and Mr. Minor:

The Court has received two letters filed on March 3, 2021—one filed by Appellee Frank Minor and the other filed by counsel for Appellant Delaware River & Bay Authority.1

In his letter, Mr. Minor asks the Court to strike Appellant’s Reply Brief because it was filed later than 10 days after Appellant’s counsel received his Responding Brief.2 Mr. Minor notes that this deadline was established in the briefing schedule that the Court issued on November 19, 2020.3

1 Trans. ID. 66388073; Trans. ID. 66388192. 2 Trans. ID. 66388073. 3 Trans. ID. 66388192; Trans. ID. 66126992. Appellant’s counsel respond that, due to COVID-19, they had been working remotely when the Responding Brief was delivered.4 They also explain that their law firm’s “normal protocols for logging and emailing mail to the recipient were for some reason not followed in this instance,” so they did not receive notice of the Responding Brief until it was filed electronically.5 After they received notice, Appellant’s counsel filed the Reply Brief within 10 days pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 6(a).6

Recognizing that we are in the midst of a global pandemic, which has sown much logistical confusion, the Court declines to strike Appellant’s Reply Brief for untimeliness.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Jan R. Jurden

Jan R. Jurden President Judge

JRJ:mls

cc: Prothonotary

4 Trans. ID. 66388192. 5 Id. 6 Id. 2

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Delaware River & Bay Authority v. Minor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delaware-river-bay-authority-v-minor-delsuperct-2021.