Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Hardy

35 A. 1130, 58 N.J.L. 205, 29 Vroom 205, 1895 N.J. LEXIS 23
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 15, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 35 A. 1130 (Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Hardy, 35 A. 1130, 58 N.J.L. 205, 29 Vroom 205, 1895 N.J. LEXIS 23 (N.J. 1895).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Ludlow, Magie, Bogeet, Beown, Smith. 6.

For reversal—Garrison, Gummere, Sims, Talman. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 A. 1130, 58 N.J.L. 205, 29 Vroom 205, 1895 N.J. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delaware-lackawanna-western-railroad-v-hardy-nj-1895.