Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Utica, Clinton & Binghamton Railroad
259 A.D. 969, 20 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7463
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 8, 1940
StatusPublished
This text of 259 A.D. 969 (Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Utica, Clinton & Binghamton Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Utica, Clinton & Binghamton Railroad, 259 A.D. 969, 20 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in a mortgage foreclosure action.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ. [174 Misc. 403. See post, p. 986.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Utica, Clinton & Binghamton Railroad
174 Misc. 403 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 969, 20 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delaware-hudson-co-v-utica-clinton-binghamton-railroad-nyappdiv-1940.