Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Utica, Clinton & Binghamton Railroad

259 A.D. 969, 20 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7463

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in a mortgage foreclosure action.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ. [174 Misc. 403. See post, p. 986.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Utica, Clinton & Binghamton Railroad, 259 A.D. 969, 20 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 969 (Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Utica, Clinton & Binghamton Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Utica, Clinton & Binghamton Railroad
174 Misc. 403 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)