Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Olyphant Borough

73 A. 458, 224 Pa. 387, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 802
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 12, 1909
DocketAppeal, No. 368
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 73 A. 458 (Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Olyphant Borough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Olyphant Borough, 73 A. 458, 224 Pa. 387, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 802 (Pa. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appeal is from a decree awarding a preliminary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff in the exercise of a right acquired by grant from the owner of the fee, to use the surface in mining and removing coal. As pointedly stated by the learned judge who heard the case: “The right which it asserts here is the' right to the use and enjoyment of certain of its land and tenements in accordance with the terms and purposes of the grant under which they are held. The injury which it seeks to prevent is the taking of some part of the property for public use without due process of law and just compensation.” On an appeal from a decree awarding or refusing a preliminary injunction we do not consider the merits of the case except to determine whether there was reasonable ground for the action of the court. The only claim of right by the defendant that is open for consideration at this time is that by ordinance it has adopted certain streets plotted by the owner of the fee after his grant of surface rights. This ordinance gave it no right as against the plaintiff.

The decree is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Philadelphia v. District Council 33
581 A.2d 916 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
Armiger v. Lewin
141 A.2d 151 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1958)
Winston v. Ladner
108 A. 22 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Cannon v. Wickham
89 A. 21 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Borough of Sunbury v. Sunbury & Susquehanna Railway Co.
88 A. 543 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 A. 458, 224 Pa. 387, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delaware-hudson-co-v-olyphant-borough-pa-1909.