Delaval v. . Clare

Court of King's Bench

Delaval v. . Clare

1 N.C. 745

DecidedJuly 5, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 745 (Delaval v. . Clare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delaval v. . Clare, 1 N.C. 745 (kingsbench 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

CURIA assented to both points.

There is no necessity here for an averment, that the apparel was convenient and suitable to the rank of the infant, for the plaintiff did not provide the materials for the suit, but only the lining, etc., and made it up. M. 3, Jac., C. B. If there be a guardian in soccage, and a copyhold escheat to the infant, the guardian may grant it over. F. N. B., 143. Guardian in soccage may grant the ward over. Novel Entry, 125, 126; Jones, 146; Roll., 729; Noy, 85; Bendl., 186.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CURIA assented to both points.

There is no necessity here for an averment, that the apparel was convenient and suitable to the rank of the infant, for the plaintiff did not provide the materials for the suit, but only the lining, etc., and made it up. M. 3, Jac., C. B. If there be a guardian in soccage, and a copyhold escheat to the infant, the guardian may grant it over. F. N. B., 143. Guardian in soccage may grant the ward over. Novel Entry, 125, 126; Jones, 146; Roll., 729; Noy, 85; Bendl., 186.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delaval-v-clare-kingsbench-1793.