DeLashmutt v. Sellwood

10 Or. 51
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1881·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Watson, J.:

On motion to dismiss for defects in appeal papers, and on the further ground that none of the errors assigned in the notices of appeal appear from the transcript on file; LI eld,

1st. That only the first mentioned grounds of dismissal can be considered under the established practice of the court.

2d. That where no affidavits showing qualifications of sureties on the undertaking for appeal, were filed with it, a cross motion for leave to file a new undertaking, with such [52]*52affidavits supplied, without alleging or showing any mistake excusing such omission in reference to the original undertaking, should not be granted. (Citing sec. 527, Civil Code and State v. McKinsmore, 8 Or., 207.)

Appeal dismissed.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeLashmutt v. Sellwood, 10 Or. 51 (Or. 1881).

10 Or. 51 (DeLashmutt v. Sellwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of County Commissioners v. Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance
30 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 163 (Hocking County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
Probate Court of Central Falls v. Adams
60 A. 769 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1905)
Newbbrg Orchard Ass'n v. Osborn
65 P. 81 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1901)
Mendenhall v. Elwert
52 P. 22 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1900)