Delap v. Lawson
This text of 190 P. 262 (Delap v. Lawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action upon a promissory note in which judgment was rendered for the defendants. The appeal is from the judgment.
The appellant mates but one specification of error, as follows:
‘ ‘ The court erred in rendering judgment against the plaintiff, the same not being supported by the evidence in the record.”
This assignment is very defective. (Caldwell v. Wells, 16 Ida. 459, 101 Pac. 812; Newport Water Co. v. Kellogg, 31 Ida. 574, 174 Pac. 602; Citizens’ Right of Way Co. v. Ayers, 32 Ida. 206, 179 Pac. 954; Citizens’ Right of Way Co. v. Pollard, 32 Ida. 212, 180 Pac. 259.)
The evidencé contained in the record is conflicting. There is ample evidence to support the findings of the trial court. The judgment is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 P. 262, 33 Idaho 95, 1920 Ida. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delap-v-lawson-idaho-1920.