Delany v. Delany
This text of 2 Thomp. & Cook 530 (Delany v. Delany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
For the reasons assigned by the court at special term, we are of opinion that.the order appealed from should be affirmed. The application to open the default was to the favor, and not a matter of strict right. The coqrt had a right to impose the condition of an immediate reference and speedy trial; and the defendant, if he did not choose to take the order with the condition, was [532]*532at liberty to decline its benefits, and allow the judgment on the trial by Judge Cardozo to stand; or, as suggested by the court below, if the condition was improperly imposed, his remedy was by appeal from that part of the order. A reversal of the order of reference in toto would simply leave the former judgment in full force.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Thomp. & Cook 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delany-v-delany-nysupct-1874.