Delanoval v. State

622 S.E.2d 811, 280 Ga. 36, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3538, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 835
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 21, 2005
DocketS05A1959
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 622 S.E.2d 811 (Delanoval v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Delanoval v. State, 622 S.E.2d 811, 280 Ga. 36, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3538, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 835 (Ga. 2005).

Opinion

Melton, Justice.

Segundo Delanoval appeals his conviction for felony murder, aggravated assault, and possession of a knife during the commission of a felony, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.1 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the conviction.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the record shows that, on October 23, 1999, Robert Williams, who lived in the same rooming house as Delanoval, started to loudly argue with his girlfriend, Corina Barber, and her mother, Anqunette Barber. Del-anoval, who was Anqunette Barber’s boyfriend, entered the room where the argument was occurring, stepped between Williams and Anqunette Barber, and shouted at them to stop arguing. Williams told Delanoval to leave his room, but Delanoval remained and cursed at Williams. Williams then slapped Delanoval, and their confrontation moved into the hallway. During a heated exchange of words, Delanoval re-entered his room, took a serrated knife from a drawer, walked back into the hallway, and stabbed Williams in the chest, thereby puncturing his heart. Delanoval then ran away from the boarding house with the knife in his hand, and he was apprehended approximately two months later in a homeless shelter. At the time of his arrest, Delanoval admitted to the stabbing.

[37]*37Decided November 21, 2005. Carl P. Greenberg, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Marc A. Mallon, Assistant District Attorneys, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Vonnetta L. Benjamin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

This evidence was sufficient to support Delanoval’s conviction. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). Although Delanoval argues that he acted in self-defense, the jury was authorized to disbelieve his testimony in favor of the testimony of the State’s witnesses. See, e.g., Mickens v. State, 277 Ga. 627, 629 (593 SE2d 350) (2004).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allen v. State
723 S.E.2d 684 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 S.E.2d 811, 280 Ga. 36, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3538, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delanoval-v-state-ga-2005.