Delano v. Interstate Trucking Co.

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Delano v. Interstate Trucking Co.

2 R.I. Dec. 126

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMarch 4, 1926

DocketLawNo.3584

StatusPublished

This text of 2 R.I. Dec. 126 (Delano v. Interstate Trucking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delano v. Interstate Trucking Co., 2 R.I. Dec. 126 (R.I. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

WALSH, J.

The plaintiff in this case was a passenger in the automobile which was the subject of the case of DeLoss H. Scott vs. Interstate Trucking Company. Law 3583. Mr. Delano was a passenger and received quite severe injuries to his face and chin and lower left leg. He has a permanent sear on his chin and' á numbness of the lip, which prevents comfortable shaving, drinking, talking, etc. The numbness and disability will toe permanent, in the opinion of the doctor, as a nerve has been severed in the chin.

In view of our decision on liability in the case of DeLoss H. Scott versus this defendant, it is not necessary for us to discuss that phase of the motion for a new trial. The verdict of $1220. for Mr. Delano, which includes, $118.40 for actual expense, is not, in our opinion, excessive. ;

Motion for new trial denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALSH, J.

The plaintiff in this case was a passenger in the automobile which was the subject of the case of DeLoss H. Scott vs. Interstate Trucking Company. Law 3583. Mr. Delano was a passenger and received quite severe injuries to his face and chin and lower left leg. He has a permanent sear on his chin and' á numbness of the lip, which prevents comfortable shaving, drinking, talking, etc. The numbness and disability will toe permanent, in the opinion of the doctor, as a nerve has been severed in the chin.

In view of our decision on liability in the case of DeLoss H. Scott versus this defendant, it is not necessary for us to discuss that phase of the motion for a new trial. The verdict of $1220. for Mr. Delano, which includes, $118.40 for actual expense, is not, in our opinion, excessive. ;

Motion for new trial denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 R.I. Dec. 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delano-v-interstate-trucking-co-risuperct-1926.